When a project fails, the first instinct of a bureaucracy is to blame the “Methodology.”
-
“Agile isn’t working for us.”
-
“We need to switch from Waterfall to Scrum.”
-
“The PMI principles are too rigid for our culture.”
This is almost always a lie. It is an attempt to solve a People Problem with a Process Solution.
The Sovereign Architect knows that a methodology is just a tool. A Stradivarius violin in the hands of an amateur produces noise; in the hands of a master, it produces music. If the results are poor, you don’t “alter the violin” to make it easier for the amateur. You find a better violinist.
The Incompetence Trap
Organizations often “dumb down” their practices to accommodate the lowest common denominator of their management team.
-
They remove accountability to “pacify” managers.
-
They blur the lines of “Responsibility” because people are afraid of failure.
-
They trade Principles for Convenience.
The result is Institutional Rot. You end up with a “Custom Methodology” that is essentially a map of your team’s weaknesses.
[Image: A sophisticated control panel (The Methodology) being operated by a person wearing oven mitts (The Poor Manager). The output screen shows “Error.”]
The Hierarchy of Execution
To build a high-performance ecosystem like Polynxt, you must respect the hierarchy of what actually drives results:
-
Talent (The Driver): High-agency individuals with high-resolution judgment.
-
Principles (The Compass): The immutable laws of project management (Scope, Time, Cost, Quality).
-
Methodology (The Vehicle): The specific framework (Agile, Lean, etc.) used to apply the principles.
You cannot skip Level 1 and expect Level 3 to save you.
The Protocol: The “People-First” Audit
Before you allow anyone to suggest a “Change in Process,” perform this audit:
1. The “Competence Check” Is the failure a result of a flaw in the system, or a failure to execute the system? If the same methodology works for a different team in the same industry, the problem isn’t the methodology.
2. The “Standard of Excellence” Do not lower the bar to meet the team. Raise the team to meet the bar. If a project manager cannot operate within a proven, high-resolution framework, they are a systemic risk.
3. The Surgical Replacement The original 2012 insight remains true: It is more effective to change the “Whom” before you change the “What.” Switching methodologies to hide incompetence is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
#DhandheKaFunda: A bad craftsman blames his tools. A bad leader changes the tools to suit the craftsman. Protect the principles; upgrade the people.